|
“Jury finds Burns,
Rafay guilty in '94 triple murder.”
Sara Jean Green and Christine Clarridge, Seattle
Times
After 3-1/2 days of deliberations, a jury of six men and
six women yesterday convicted Glen Sebastian Burns and Atif
Ahmad Rafay on three counts each of aggravated first-degree
murder for the 1994 bludgeoning deaths of Rafay's parents
and sister in Bellevue.
Moments before the verdict was read, King County Superior
Court Judge Charles Mertel called counsel into his chambers,
where, it was later revealed, he relayed a question from
jurors asking if they could attend the sentencing. After
somber-looking attorneys returned to the courtroom, the defense
lawyers whispered to their clients.
Burns shook his head and mouthed the
word "sentence" to
his family, which was seated directly behind him in the packed
courtroom. Defense lawyer Veronica Freitas put her arms around
Rafay, hugging him.
At 2:55 p.m., the jury filed into Mertel's courtroom for
the last time after hearing nearly six months of testimony.
Jurors found the defendants, both 28, guilty of using a
baseball bat to kill Rafay's father, Tariq; mother, Sultana;
and developmentally disabled sister, Basma, on a July night
almost 10 years ago.
The case against Burns and Rafay was marked by controversy
and delay from the beginning. It included an undercover Canadian
police operation, a years-long extradition battle, an international
debate on the death penalty, and a jailhouse sex scandal
involving Burns and his former public defender.
Throughout the trial, the state argued Burns and Rafay committed
the slayings in order to cash in on a $500,000 inheritance.
Prosecutors said their case came down to physical evidence
at the Rafay home, the unwilling but damaging testimony of
the defendants' best friend, and videotaped confessions obtained
by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) during a five-month
undercover operation that led to the arrests of the pair
a year after the slayings.
Jurors yesterday agreed there were two
aggravating factors — that
the murders were committed for money and were part of a common
scheme or plan — which means Burns and Rafay can only
be sentenced to three consecutive life terms with no possibility
of parole.
Despite the foreshadowing in the jurors'
request to attend the sentencing, both Burns and Rafay
seemed incredulous as the word "guilty" was repeated
six times. Rafay sat with his head down, slowly opening
and closing his eyes, looking stricken. Burns stared at
the jury with his jaw slack, shaking his head.
One juror, Steve Wilson, met Burns' stare
as he answered "yes" when
the judge polled jurors, asking them if the verdict was both
their own verdict and the verdict of the jury as a whole.
"I wanted to say it to his face. I wanted to say, 'I'm
an honest man and that's my honest opinion,' " Wilson
said later, after the judge told jurors they could answer
questions from lawyers and reporters.
Freitas, one of Rafay's attorneys, said
her client will appeal. "We're very disappointed," she
said, adding that the issues Rafay plans to raise on appeal
include allegations of prosecutorial misconduct and the
judge's decision to allow incriminating, videotaped statements
captured by the RCMP into evidence.
Burns' family and defense team declined to talk to reporters
as they left the courtroom.
The defense argued during the trial that Burns and Rafay
falsely confessed because they believed that if they didn't,
they'd be killed by men they thought were big-money mobsters.
Some jurors remained in court to speak
about the case afterward. One female juror, who didn't
give her name, said they arrived at their relatively quick
verdict because "we just found
the evidence against them overwhelming." Jurors also
said they didn't buy the defense's argument that Burns and
Rafay were coerced into making false statements.
"Not once did Burns or Rafay look intimidated or scared
to me," Wilson said, referring to the videotaped confessions
given to undercover operators whom he described as "masterful" — despite
their expletive-laced language.
Wilson became teary talking about Basma
Rafay, who was autistic and could not speak, but who fought
her attackers and died hours after the assault. "I hope somebody finds the
time to say, 'Basma got her justice,' " he said.
Though convinced of the defendants' guilt,
many jurors said convicting the two young men was one of
the hardest things they've ever done. "It was extremely difficult. They
had such promise," juror Patrick Olsen said.
Immediately after the verdict, King County senior deputy
prosecutor James Konat telephoned the RCMP sergeant who posed
as a crime boss in the elaborate scenarios that led to Burns'
and Rafay's arrests in Vancouver, B.C., in July 1995.
"... Your streak is intact, my friend. Guilty, guilty,
guilty all along the line, " Konat told the sergeant.
He said the sergeant responded by saying, "Another day
at the office."
Konat and his trial partner, senior deputy
prosecutor Roger Davidheiser, left the courtroom to face
a crush of television cameras. Konat said evidence from
the RCMP investigation and Burns' decision to testify in
his own defense in the last days of the lengthy trial "played a huge part" in
the jury's verdict.
"I don't think Mr. Burns was convicted (simply) because
of his testimony ... I think he would have been convicted
either way," Konat said, adding Burns' "tale of
his false confession" on the witness stand was "almost
as sordid" as what he told the undercover Canadian police
in describing how he killed the Rafay family.
Both prosecutors said an appeal in a
case like this is almost automatic, but believe the verdicts
will stand. Konat, who came under fire during closing statements
last week after saying the Rafay slayings were worse than
the recent beheading of an American civilian in Iraq, said
he was "not at
all" worried his comment would constitute grounds for
an appeal.
Davidheiser said had it not been for
the RCMP investigation, which included some 4,000 hours
of audio- and videotaped surveillance of the defendants,
Burns and Rafay "would
have gotten away with murder."
"There's really no celebrating in a case like this," Davidheiser
said. "A family's been wiped out and two young men have
lost their lives" to prison.
|